Yes, and let them eat cake while you're at it.
The truth: The helmet-to-helmet rule should have been instituted years and years ago. Only in recent years have we begun to learn the consequences of such violent, concussive hits on the long-term health of football players. Medical research now tells us that the deleterious effects of football concussions often show up two, three and four decades later in the form of dementia, deep depression and even ALS (Lou Gehrig's disease).
Never was that issue more poignant than in 2007 when former Ole Miss great Gene Hickerson was pushed in a wheelchair across the stage at Canton, Ohio, for his induction into the Pro Football Hall of Fame.
There Hickerson was, receiving his sport's greatest honor at the age of 72, and he didn't appear to know where he was. He was suffering from a form of Alzheimer's his doctors believed was caused by the constant pounding he took and gave as a pulling guard for the Cleveland Browns. Hickerson died little more than a year later.
Research has shown that ex-football pros who suffered concussions are three times more likely than the general population to suffer dementia - or worse.
Startling numbers
Ray Perkins, the former football star and coach from Petal, knows all too well of "worse" situations. He coached former Alabama star fullback Kevin Turner, who went on to play nine years in the NFL. Turner was a blocking fullback, one of those battering ram-types who led with his head. Just last week, Perkins went to Birmingham to play in a golf tournament to raise money for both Turner and ALS research. Turner, who is only 41, has been diagnosed with ALS.
Further, he is the 14th former NFL player known to have been diagnosed with the incurable nerve disorder since 1960. That's a rate eight times higher than the rest of the adult male population.
"Breaks your heart," Perkins said. "Great guy, great player, two kids. ... "
And only 41. ...
Perkins, himself, suffered a helmet-to-helmet blow as a young player at Alabama.
"The other guy got up, I didn't," Perkins said. "They had to operate on me to remove a blood clot from my brain. They told me I'd never play football again."
He did, of course, helping Alabama to two national championships and the Baltimore Colts to one Super Bowl title. "Knock on wood," Perkins says, knocking on his head, "I haven't had any lasting effects."
Which brings us to another part of this issue. Only two players on those Bama national championship teams of the mid-1960s weighed more than 200 pounds. Now, even the running backs weigh more than that and there are even 250-pound quarterbacks who run 4.5 40s. You don't have to know too much about physics to know that faster, bigger players cause more violent collisions.
And while players have added so much muscle, become so much bigger and so much faster, ligaments, cartilage and brain matter are still made of the same fragile stuff.
Just Monday night, former Southern Miss linebacker Michael Boley blitzed through the Dallas Cowboys' line as if he were shot out of a cannon. He hit Cowboys quarterback Tony Romo with a perfectly legal shoulder-to-chest blow that sent Romo to the turf with such force he suffered a broken clavicle and is out for the season. There's nothing that can be done about that. That's football. But there is much that can be done about head-to-head blows. Finally, the NFL has. Guilty players will face fines and suspensions. Last week, the first week the rules were in effect, there were no flags for helmet-to-helmet hits. That is progress.
There's a right way
Here's the deal: Nowhere, at any level of football, are football players taught to tackle with their helmets. It's as dangerous for the tacklers as it is for the guys being tackled. That's how spinal injuries - such as Chucky Mullins' - happen.
Perkins, who now helps coach a junior high team in Hattiesburg, put it this way: "You teach kids to slide your head to the side before impact and to use your shoulder for the contact, and then wrap your arms around the ball carrier. That's a form tackle. Nobody, at any level, is taught to lead with his head."
Football is always going to be a dangerous sport, but there's no reason to make it more dangerous than it has to be.
http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20101028/COL0504/10280329/NFL-rule-on-helmet-hits-long-overdue
NFL’s helmet-hit rule misguided
As an attorney, I am shocked by the discussions regarding hard hits in football. In the law, there is a concept called “Assumption of Risk.” Anyone who is a football player, no matter the level, assumes the risk they may become injured due to the nature of the sport. On the professional level, obviously, the players make a conscious decision to play in the NFL for millions of dollars. Therefore, they assume the risk they may be injured on any given day.
From an athlete’s point of view, they are taught to play hard and play to win, which is contrary to political correctness that implies you cannot hurt a competitor on the field of play. That is absolutely ridiculous.
Please don’t get me wrong, if the injury caused by a player is blatant and obvious and in violation of the existing traditional standards, it should be addressed. However, the fact that someone may be injured as a result of a helmet to helmet collision, which is unintentional in the nature of an attempt to make a play, it should not result in a fine or suspension of the defensive or offensive player who committed the contact. To do so would totally change the nature of the game as well as years of coaching teaching players to be aggressive in an aggressive sport.
In conclusion, hopefully the NFL administrative leadership should not yield to the politically correct outcry that players should be penalized or suspended as a result of being coached to be aggressive on the field of competition.
Steven R. Heuberger
http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20101112/discuss/711139944/
This is great topic. I understand the NFL wanting to protect its player, but it's their career. They are going to have to take risk of getting injured because that's part of the game. Just as it's a risk of soldiers getting shot for their job.
ReplyDeleteGreat idea, however make sure you post both sides, although i agree with the statement above, i also disagree, it is their job but they have a right to safety as the hits that are being called are malicious, and yes its a soldiers job to fight, but on the inverse side we dont send them on blatantly suicidal missions either, great job so far!
ReplyDeleteI have to agree with James. It's a difficult topic to go with. But you have great supporting details!
ReplyDelete